One of the many examples of bad behavior in Mistakes Were Made (But Not Me): Why We Justify Silly Beliefs, Bad Decisions, And Hurtful Acts by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson is Oprah Winfrey’s public endorsement of A million small parts by James Frey, which was a literary fraud. It was a mistake that any talk show host could make, but Oprah tried to justify her mistake on the Larry King show and made a series of irrational statements, such as “the truth is not important.” Tavris and Aronson say there is a “pyramid of choice” in which King and Winfrey were at the top because they had similar moral values. After Winfrey made her mistake, however, she descended into a position of moral inferiority. His subsequent public apology received a lot of praise because it is highly unusual for people to admit that they made a mistake.

The authors analyze this type of behavior with the theory of cognitive dissonance, which has “inspired more than 3,000 experiments that, collectively, have transformed psychologists’ understanding of the workings of the human mind” (location 226). The theory is that Oprah suffered mentally and emotionally because her idea that the book was good was incompatible with reality, and she lessened her suffering (at first) by making self-justifying statements. The following quote from a famous psychoanalyst shows that anxiety or stress can inhibit a person from thinking intelligently and rationally:

Take, for example, a person who listens to an article and has critical thoughts about it. A minor inhibition would consist of a shyness to express criticism; a strong inhibition would prevent him from organizing his thoughts, with the result that they would occur to him only after the discussion was over, or the next morning. But inhibition can go so far as not to allow critical thoughts to arise at all, and in this case, assuming that you really feel critical, you will be inclined to blindly accept or even admire what is said; and you will not realize that you have inhibitions. In other words, if an inhibition stops the desires or impulses, there can be no awareness of their existence. (The neurotic personality of our time, Karen Horney, MD, New York: Norton, 1937, p. 55)

In religion, there are three fundamental truths that cause anxiety or cognitive dissonance: 1) The existence of God. 2) The resurrection of Jesus. 3) The inauthenticity of the Shroud of Turin.

Existence of god

We know that God exists by the arguments of Thomas Aquinas and Ètienne Gilson: Finite beings (humans) exist. Finite beings need a cause. Ergo, there is an infinite being (God). You can see that this argument is actually a test when considering the question of whether or not humans have free will.

The evidence for free will is that slavery is illegal, but it is not illegal to own animals and raise them for food. This could suggest that people who think that humans do not have free will have bad judgment. However, it is not necessary to make a decision on this matter. No one is arguing that slavery should be legalized because humans are no better than animals. He shows no lack of judgment to speculate on whether or not humans have free will and to play devil’s advocate promoting the so-called philosophy positivism. However, regarding the question of the existence of God, a decision must be made: Is there life after death? Will we pay for our sins after we die? It is because of the need to make this decision that one’s statements and thoughts about the existence of God can reflect poorly on one’s character.

The following four statements are wise, intelligent, rational, and honest ways to justify the decision that life ends in the grave:

1) God has not given me the gift of faith. 2) The concept of God is contradictory. 3) If God cared about our welfare, He would not cause so much suffering. 4) The argument for the existence of God is not convincing.

It is irrational to say: “I do not believe in life after death, because God does not exist.” When a person says this, they go down the “pyramid of choice” for the sake of self-justification. The claim is absurd because it makes no sense to consider whether there is life after death if God does not exist and to consider whether God exists or not if you are not trying to decide if there is life after death.

The resurrection of Jesus

The resurrection of Jesus is a historical event. The followers of Jesus were scattered in fear and disappointment after the crucifixion, but they renewed their fellowship within a few years and swore up and down that Jesus appeared to them after his death.

The faith of Christians is that Jesus is alive in a new life with God and if you follow Jesus the same thing can happen to you. There is a gap between this belief and the historical event. This gap is widening because there are many supposedly knowledgeable, intelligent, rational and honest people who do not believe in life after death.

This does not cause me any stress because I understand that most non-believers are not informed because they do not know the argument for the existence of God. They are not intelligent because they do not understand why humans are spirits incarnate. With the exception of Jean-Paul Sartre, who said that “man is a useless passion”, they are not rational about the meaning of life. They are not honest because they use the spurious rebuttal: “Who made God?”

Many Christians relieve stress by asking what caused the resurrection of Jesus. This question cannot be answered because the gospels were written many years after the Resurrection. But if you assume that the question is a good one, you justify the invention of hypotheses to answer the question. The two most common hypotheses are: 1) The followers of Jesus were hallucinating. 2) A bodily resurrection of Jesus occurred, that is, a video camera may have recorded the event. The next step is to assume a high probability for the resurrection theory and a low probability for the hallucination theory. These probability assumptions are accompanied by the explanation that those who disagree are materialists, agnostics, or atheists. This reasoning transforms faith in Jesus into a historical event, although only a probable event. The gap between this highly probable event and faith is closed with the idea of ​​an “leap of faith.” The net result, however, is self-justification and placing non-believers low on the “pyramid of choice.”

The Shroud of Turin

The Shroud of Turin contains a bloodstained image of the front and back of Jesus. It is clearly the work of artisans or artists who used a crucified victim or a volunteer and methods that have been lost to history to tell the gospel stories of the crucifixion of Jesus. Evidence that the Shroud never touched Jesus is the unusual dimensions of the canvas, the unperforated bloodstains, and the existence of a detailed image. The Shroud is a sign or reason to believe in Jesus, but many Christians prefer to think that it is evidence that supports the theory of the bodily resurrection of Jesus.